Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 590 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 164.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 365W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 590
1.244 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +864%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2011
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 500
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
854 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
164.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
22
512
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.46 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
38.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
155.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

365W
TDP
70W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
AD107
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy