Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 645 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
360 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 645 OEM +77%
0.949 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
576
Shading Units
216
48
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.888 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
39.55 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
949.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
39.55 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GT200B
GK106-200-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy