Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
Boost Clock758MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680M
2.038 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +82%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 600M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

719 MHz
Base Clock
-
758 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
1344
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
84.90 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
2.038 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
84.90 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Amethyst
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy