Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2013
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
888 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
85.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
85.25 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV516
GK104-200-KD-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy