Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1072MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 X2 +295%
2.47 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1072 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
480
96
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.73 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
102.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.470 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
102.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Turks
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy