Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (937MHz vs 657MHz)
Lower TDP (20W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760M
1.009 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350 +18%
1.199 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 700M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

628 MHz
Base Clock
747 MHz
657 MHz
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
768
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
42.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
1009 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
42.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GP107
N14E-GL-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy