Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M and 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 208% (2025MHz vs 657MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760M
1.009 TFLOPS
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +722%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 700M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

628 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
657 MHz
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.80 GPixel/s
42.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
1009 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
42.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
AD107
N14E-GL-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy