Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1219MHz vs 863MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 765M +6%
1.326 TFLOPS
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce 700M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
863 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.81 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
55.23 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1326 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
55.23 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Lexa
N14E-GE-B-A1
GPU Variant
Lexa MCM Pro
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy