Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +82%
1.828 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV770
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy