Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +701%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
143W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G80
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy