Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +3962%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT218
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy