Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 3650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 3650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 3650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +950%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3650
0.174 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.900 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
174.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV635
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
RV635 PRO (215-0682008)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy