NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1762MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
RTX A400
+48%
2.706 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 900
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GA107
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
