Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960A and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 95% (2115MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960A
1.389 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +835%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900A
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
640
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
AD107
N16P-GX-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy