Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 99% (2000MHz vs 1006MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX110
0.515 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M +695%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2017
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce MX(1xx)
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

978 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1006 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.048 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
16.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
515.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
16.10 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108S
GPU Name
DG2-128
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy