Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1605MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +948%
8.218 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1519 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1605 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
256
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.04 GPixel/s
24.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.4 GTexel/s
12.25 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.218 TFLOPS
783.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.218 TFLOPS
24.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
AD107
N17S-G0-A1
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
74 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy