Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs ATI Radeon E4690 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs ATI Radeon E4690 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (10W vs 30W)
ATI Radeon E4690 PCIe 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX230 +104%
0.784 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 PCIe
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1519 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
24.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
12.25 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
783.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
24.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

10W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
RV730
N17S-G0-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy