Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs AMD Radeon E8950

NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs AMD Radeon E8950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1531MHz vs 1000MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E8950 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
Radeon E8950 +422%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Sep 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1519 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
24.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
12.25 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
783.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
24.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
256.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Amethyst
N17S-G0-A1
GPU Variant
E8950
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy