Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon HD 6490M Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon HD 6490M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 6490M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.41GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250 +232%
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6490M Mac Edition
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce MX
Generation
Vancouver
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
794 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.41GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
384
Shading Units
160
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Seymour
-
GPU Variant
Seymour XTX M2 (216-0809000)
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy