Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1038MHz vs 907MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.28GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 460 +133%
1.858 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2016
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.51 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.05 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.858 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.858 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
116.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy