Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R9 A375

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R9 A375

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 A375 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1038MHz vs 925MHz)
AMD Radeon R9 A375 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 A375 +62%
1.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.24 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.60 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1299 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

10W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Venus
-
GPU Variant
Venus XTX (216-0846033)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy