Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (1755MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile +1146%
8.986 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Oct 2014
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1455 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1755 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
140.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
8.986 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
8.986 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
140.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Topaz
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy