Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2520 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +32090%
13.52 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV610
-
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy