Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

18
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV380
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy