Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +38528%
13.52 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
18
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT216
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy