Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +310%
13.52 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 40
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
190W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy