Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q +3659%
28.31 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

163.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
442.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.36 GTexel/s
28.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
28.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
442.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
GK107
GN21-X11
GPU Variant
GT 755M
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy