Home GPU Comparison Intel GMA X4500 vs AMD FirePro A300

Intel GMA X4500 vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel GMA X4500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock905MHz
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GMA X4500
0.085 TFLOPS
FirePro A300 +717%
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
GMA Graphics
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
760 MHz
-
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
384
10
TMUs
24
1
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

533.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
5.330 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
85.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

13W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Eaglelake
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy