Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K140Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA GRID K140Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K140Q and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K140Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K140Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 +13636%
44.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Apr 2023
GRID
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2499 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
70
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
4480
16
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
70
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
319.9 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
699.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.56 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.78 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1399 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
260W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy