Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (45W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q +21%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro 1000M
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
96
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy