Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1792GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000M +58%
0.518 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jul 2010
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1792MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
192
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy