Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K240Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +888%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Dec 2021
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
6656
128
TMUs
416
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy