Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (189W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q +268%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1536
Shading Units
240
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
189W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy