Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q +3779%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Sep 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
32
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
42W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy