Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K500 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

NVIDIA GRID K500 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K500 and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1597MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K500
2.289 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB +614%
16.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1245 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1597 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1536
Shading Units
5120
128
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
204.4 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
511.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.71 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.35 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.177 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy