Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520 +4770%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2010
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1536
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy