Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q +9852%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
1536
Shading Units
8
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
12W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy