Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1530MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
12.86 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +21%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2019
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
80
4608
Shading Units
5120
288
TMUs
320
96
ROPs
128
576
Tensor Cores
640
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GV100
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy