Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

Intel H3C XG310 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (2350MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +102%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Aug 2022
H3C Graphics
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy