Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1837MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +2507%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jan 2024
H3C Graphics
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
96GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
16896
48
TMUs
528
24
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
GB100
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Blackwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
208 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

300W
TDP
1000W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy