Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FireGL V7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+520%
2.381 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Aug 2007
H3C Graphics
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
127W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.72 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
