Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +235%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Mar 2016
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.9 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy