Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V7900

Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +28%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
May 2011
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.64 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy