Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1755MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM +239%
8.087 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1515 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.16 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
126.4 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.087 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.087 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
126.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
130W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-150-KA-A1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
12 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy