Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
6848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +588%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
1344
256
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy