Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
45W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G71
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
