Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
5312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +183%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2880
256
TMUs
240
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy