Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +2478%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy