Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+315%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
