CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+315%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro K5200
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy