Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 224.4GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1165MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +209%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro M5500 Mobile
4.772 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2016
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1165 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.56 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.1 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.772 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
149.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy